Joe Doyle N.Y. NAT'L and it's 11 "cousins"......PART 2

[Bpm0014]

Thanks fellas! I'll send a scan as soon as I get home. It's definitely noticeable...

[Bpm0014]

Pic 1 (on right)

[Bpm0014]

Pic 2

[Bpm0014]

Pic 3

[Bpm0014]

Ted, it appears that my “poor man’s Doyle” is identical to yours.

[Sean]

Brendan, it is an interesting little variation.

[Bpm0014]

Thanks Sean! I did purchase it as a variation, and yes it definitely is neat. Not too many of these around. It's as close as I'll ever get to the NY NAT'L one. Also, it's much more noticeable in person than these blurry pictures indicate...

[tedzan]

Originally Posted by Bpm0014

Ted, it appears that my “poor man’s Doyle” is identical to yours.

Hi Brendan

Your "poor man's" Joe Doyle error card exactly matches mine. Thanks for posting it. Your card makes it 17 of a total of 205 samples of this Doyle with the "printer's mark".
That translates to 8 % of the Joe Doyle cards with this mark that have been noted in my 10+ years survey.

Brendan....please tell me which T-brand is on the back of your card ?

Thanks




.............................................^.... .................................................. .........................^ Printer's Mark




TED Z

T206 Reference
.

[Jobu]

Here is my poor man's Poor Man's Doyle (Piedmont 350).