Quote:
Originally Posted by mzm55
I am fairly confident that I discovered the mystery of the unknown “Bourguise” card a little over a year ago. First, most have speculated that the player actually pictured is David Bourquin who appears in the second series. This then raises additional questions – did Dave Bourquin have a connection with Rocky Mt. and Fulton? As far as I know, Dave Bourquin is not formally listed as playing for either of these teams. However, my research indicates that he did in fact play for both.
First, there needs to be proof that David Bourquin played for Rocky Mt. The clipped attached below is from November 27, 1909 - David Bourqin was indeed with the Rocky Mt. team.
Second, a connection needs to be made between David Bourquin and simply “Fulton” in order to solve the mystery of his uniform. This, I believe, is what has essentially stumped everyone at this point. The second clipped i've attached shows David Bourquin playing with Fulton in July 1908.
In addition to these two teams, David Bourqin jumped around quite a bit and played with many other clubs. I am confident that the “Bourguise” card was an error – a misspelling and using an outdated photo with an obscure team.
Best,
Zach
|
Zach, great stuff. If this is the case this would cause many more questions to when the set was produced. Especially since Gilmore and Walsh were gone from their respective teams long before November. What we will never find out is why they chose the players they did! Michael points out that Wilson was the champs and that makes sense why they have the most cards in the set. However, some of the other selections are odd in terms of their service with their team listed.
12-26-2017, 01:12 PM
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode