![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
W600 Sporting Life Cabinets should be an M issue, just like M110s and M116s.
H801-7 Old Mill Cabinets should be a T issue. Last edited by Baseball Rarities; 10-09-2017 at 10:55 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The T205s should be reclassified as T204.74
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
W503 should be reclassified as an 'E' issue.
Brian |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Scrapps Tobacco" ain't tobacco cards, yet both PSA and SGC continue to label as such. They have definitively been found to have been gum cards.
Tom C |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
E98's should no longer be catalogued exclusively as candy cards, since they have no product advertising, and the Black Swamp find confirmed that they were distributed through other venues.
Last edited by barrysloate; 10-10-2017 at 06:15 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
All E95/E96 blank backs that are slabbed as proofs should be slabbed as cut outs from notebooks, scorecards, etc. I have never seen anything that looks like a real proof.
__________________
Collection: https://www.flickr.com/photos/132359235@N05/sets/ For Sale: https://www.flickr.com/photos/132359...7719430982559/ Ebay listings: https://www.ebay.com/sch/harrydoyle/...p2047675.l2562 |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sponsor's advertisements are printed on all insert cards; the reason for the extra expense of the premium.
The newly credited sponsor, H D Smith & Co. Gum, have no advertising on the Scrapps. (?) Large thin card - thin gum. Packaged together - boxed? I'm still looking for an 1888 Green and Blackwell Co. Gum (E223) Card Package - I've added to that an HDS Gum (Scrapps) package. Doubt their existence. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1959, 1973 BB Partial Sets, '76 & 77 complete sets, 2016 Topps rare sets!! 11/29 End | wolf441 | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 11-29-2016 08:31 AM |
What if..Burdick had classified T206's with respect to their individual 15 T-brands ? | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 64 | 02-25-2010 11:09 AM |
Should MELLO-MINT's be classified as an "R" set ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 40 | 07-23-2008 08:52 PM |
Classified Ads | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 08-04-2002 04:07 PM |
Classified Ads | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 04-26-2002 08:57 AM |