![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jefferson Burdick, who coined the term T206, originally included it in the set; that's why it is considered a T206. It is possible that Burdick never actually held one, and may not have known about the finish. Should it be in the set? That's open to debate. Much like the debate we have about T213 and T215 Type-1s.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Discovery to the Hobby - E98 Old Put Back with an Orange Front! | Tim Kindler | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 02-08-2014 12:45 PM |
Modest Discovery in my collection (T206 back) | TobaccoKing4 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-29-2011 07:43 AM |
New discovery of Old Mill Double Bars Overprint Back | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 08-08-2008 09:33 AM |
New Discovery - New E121-Like Back Variation Found! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 07-21-2008 08:49 PM |
2002 T206 Cobb w/ Bazooka back vs. T206 Cobb w/ Ty Cobb back | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 03-13-2002 05:40 PM |