![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There is a big jump on the jeter from 8 to 9, so for value I'd pick up an 8. For the Ryan the sweet spot would be a 7 or 8 depending on your budget. If you want to stay under a grand you could find a nice 6.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If I stand corrected, that it is better to buy a BVG Jeter than a PSA. I remember reading somewhere that PSA had the tendacy to view them as short?????
__________________
1916-20 UNC Big Heads Need: Ping Bodie |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
When you say "better" to get BGS cards of the 1993 SP Foil Jeter, that's because they will grade the cards cut short from the factory, while PSA will normally send them back MINSIZREQ (not a full 2.5x3.5 card). So yes, a BGS 8 will cost significantly less than a PSA 8.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
*double post*
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. Last edited by swarmee; 07-18-2017 at 03:39 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree with Jesse that if you want quality, and don't want to break the bank on the Jeter, go for a nice PSA 8. If you can search for one at the National, it helps to hold one of these in person so you can look for any surface flaws (they scratch very easily, and sometimes it's hard to see these in a scan. Sometimes scratches are also OVERemphasized in a scan, so your mileage may vary).
For the Ryan, you could likely find a nice PSA 6 that looks really nice in hand, but doesn't break the bank, so to speak. The nice thing about the '68 issue is the burlap sack pattern on the front has a tendency to hide corner wear. If you want a challenge, try to find a nice PSA 5 or 6 with near perfect centering on the front. Not easy to find. Good luck! Cool cards to have on your list. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The opposite is true. It's better to buy a PSA graded Jeter. If you can't get psa to grade your raw jeter than its best to give BGS a try.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thoughts on Grading Cards... | Harliduck | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 46 | 06-25-2016 04:52 PM |
Random thoughts on 1915 CJS; tough cards, o/c cards, tilt... | rainier2004 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 12-12-2015 06:07 PM |
Wanting T206 Cards | wazoo | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 4 | 07-08-2012 07:45 PM |
Wanting to buy a large group of graded T206 or T205 cards | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 04-03-2007 05:41 PM |
wanting any caramel (e) cards | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 09-13-2005 04:37 PM |