![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I just got this color-challenged Tinker. I'm including a normal Tinker for comparison. The card is missing red - either from fading or from being printed that way. What's more interesting is the back. It seems to have faded as well. I don't see any paper loss or damage from glue, but it is so faded that the Factory line is gone.
I'm wondering if anyone has any thoughts as to how this happens. scan0002.jpg scan0003.jpg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Does this t206 look legit to you ?? | Joshchisox08 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 05-10-2015 07:56 AM |
T206 Cobb.. legit? | 1966CUDA | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 11-20-2012 04:15 PM |
Stolen Scan or Legit Auction??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 03-29-2006 11:00 AM |
Is this a legit t206 error?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 11-19-2004 09:08 AM |
--Elliot: Scott is looking for a scan of a (my) T206 Plank--did AN YONE save the scan? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 03-28-2003 08:56 AM |