![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I sold one about a year ago in similar condition for around 600
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for everyone help :-). It's hard to explain the true value to a long time collector looking to sell. He thinks the set is worh $900 ugh I didn't think that was right.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here is a 71 set averaging VG shape with nice visual appeal, recently sold for just shy of $500 with PWCC.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1971-Topps-L...p2047675.l2557 Others 71 sets in the vg-ex to ex range recently sold in the $500-600 range. One Vg set sold for $600+ as a BO.....using best offer may be your best option for the highest price realized Over the past few years, I have won via auction several 71 sets with less visual appeal than this one for under $400. I agree, many card owners tend to over value/over grade their cards. At $900, a VG 71 set would be a museum piece. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Seen a couple of them sell on Ebay for between $300 and $400. I suppose it could go a little higher, just depends on the bidders.
__________________
Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agree!!
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just a general observation here. The obvious problems with the '71 set are those deadly black borders. It makes the corner/side wear so obvious that it leaps right out at you, and it's impossible to ignore. Say you had a 1973 set, for instance, in the exact same condition as the 1971 set. It would appear to be in much better shape because a lot of the wear would sorta blend in. The '71 cards don't have that luxury.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Totally agree Elm!! Plus so many people have cards in that set with issues, meaning recolored, many times the owner doesn't even notice. I was able to score a 73 vg-vg+Ex set today at a good price, so that made me happy :-). Definitely a bigger fan of the 71 set, Munson, Clemente, Garvey, and Ryan are prob my top 4 of the set.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sold 1972 Topps WS Clemente PSA 7, 1958 Topps C. Flood BVG 5.5, 1952 Topps Kennedy | brian29575 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-01-2015 05:21 PM |
Looking for 1936 S S Game, 54 Topps, 59 Topps, 61 Topps, 69-70 Topps Basketball | Shorttmail66 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 03-01-2015 03:36 PM |
FS: 1959 Topps Mays, Aaron, Koufax, 1971 Topps Blyleven RC PSA 6, 1952 Topps, Modern | orioles93 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-06-2013 10:59 AM |
For Sale- Mickey Mantle cards 1957 Topps, 1960 Topps, 1963 Topps, and 1966 Topps | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 02-01-2009 12:51 AM |
1957 Topps, 1962 Topps, 1960 Topps and 1954 Topps (Moved to Auction and Shows) | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 6 | 01-04-2009 07:12 PM |