Helmar Discussion and Debate Here

GregMitch34 · #1 06-01-2017, 02:14 PM

I agree with Jeff on that. No reason for severe aging on all cards, should be variety, and sometimes too much aging is distracting--for example, no need for such extreme corner wear on all the Imperial Cabinets.

sirraffles · #2 06-01-2017, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregMitch34

I agree with Jeff on that. No reason for severe aging on all cards, should be variety, and sometimes too much aging is distracting--for example, no need for such extreme corner wear on all the Imperial Cabinets.

We probably could use a little more variety in the distressing. More nicks and cuts, etc. Variety in toning, though we've been changing that up. I'll address more variety as we go forward.

Yes, too much aging can be distracting. But that thought goes against variety in aging. I like having some really beat up, even if they bring me less money.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Don't be surprised if..... (HOF debate!)	jimivintage	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	62	09-03-2014 09:53 PM
PSA vs SGC...the definitive Debate!!!	ullmandds	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	139	06-29-2012 07:21 PM
HOF Debate	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	27	01-17-2009 11:50 PM
Restoration debate	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	11	11-19-2006 02:24 PM
A Great Debate?	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	7	08-23-2002 12:15 AM