 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27
05-03-2017, 07:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
The conflict of interest is my biggest contention. Yes, I do think that a TPA can be complicit in giving favorable treatment to individuals, like the Wagner situation you brought up. But that end was for publicity, not to sell a fake Wagner that was holdered as real to generate that publicity. The Wagner was still an authentic card and PSA had no ownership of it.
My main contention is that an individual who certs their own items for their own resale could be a dangerous model for the hobby should one of those individuals find themselves in some trouble. I don't think you run that same risk with the TPA. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Here are some additions that I made to my Topps Cardinals Autograph Collection | frankhardy | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 12-30-2014 11:07 PM |
| SGC Autograph Authentication | wastewater | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 09-13-2014 01:08 PM |
| Question on Autograph Authentication | IronHorse2130 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 05-06-2009 03:41 AM |
| PSA Autograph Authentication Problems | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 01-19-2005 08:41 AM |
| Autograph Authentication | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 04-10-2004 12:27 PM |
Threaded Mode