 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12
02-22-2017, 12:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I like SGC more than PSA. Most of my collection is in SGC holders. I think they are more consistent, their holders make cards look better and their customer service is far better than PSA's but this new pricing makes no sense to me. Maybe it is a push to get people to buy memberships in order to take part in the grading discounts? Fact is that card for card by grade, PSA crushes SGC and since most of my submissions for grading are for resale there is no way I could pay more to sell something for less.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Should Seller Reimburse Buyer For Grading Fees? | Buythatcard | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 11-24-2009 10:08 PM |
| 1961 Fleer Baseball PSA lot (below grading fees) | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-25-2008 10:11 PM |
| Change in SGC grading fees | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-09-2008 10:42 AM |
| PSA T3 grading fees | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 02-01-2007 03:35 PM |
| Grading fees from PSA and SGC | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 06-30-2005 07:03 AM |
Threaded Mode