 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
10-24-2016, 05:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Maybe a PSA 3(MK) for mark designation. Equates to the value of a PSA 1 poor. So it would grade, but is not worth it if the signature is fake.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Worth grading? | rdwyer | Football Cards Forum | 2 | 07-28-2013 05:19 PM |
| Are these '33 Goudeys worth grading? | jburl | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-10-2013 02:46 PM |
| Worth grading low-mid grade commons? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-23-2008 05:58 PM |
| Is this T-206 Worth Grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-03-2008 02:03 PM |
| worth grading? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-30-2006 09:07 PM |
Threaded Mode