![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If the colors are true I would agree, #2 is the best looking card.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Mantle #1 sold in April 2016 for $294K according to VCP. Any guesses of what it will sell for this time? Is the latest price run-up over, or will this card continue to go up? How about the Mantle #2? Will it surpass the PSA graded copy?
![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I see the point you're trying to make but doubt the auction results will reflect the board's opinion. 330k for the PSA, 210k for the SGC.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You may be right. I figure this card is so out of the league for most of us, that we really have no concept of what it should sell for. That's why I gave recently realized prices, but it's probably hard for most of us to know which way the market is really going for the high-end material.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You may be right. And it is stupid. Number 2 (if colors sre true as another person mentioned) BLOWS AWAY number 1. In fact, i like both sgc cards much better than the psa. Guys buying holders instead of cards really bothers me.
Last edited by orly57; 10-01-2016 at 10:11 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
People are selling 'independent' opinions....if there was no holder every seller would be saying their card is 'mint' would be so many returns..
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well, the PSA Mantle finished at $306,250 in the Goldin Auction. I wonder how the SGC will fair? Nearly everyone seemed to pick it over the PSA example, but I wonder if it will be able to top $306K?
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My money says no. PSA, although I hate to admit it, seems to always, (based on what I have seen) come out on top price wise.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 Last edited by irv; 10-04-2016 at 05:54 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Goldin sold #2 two months ago for 180k. Now Goodwin is selling it.and it is at 170k with 2 days left.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Right. But two months ago may be like an eternity in "Mantle Land". What will it bring this time? I'm going to guess less than the PSA example. I'll guess it ends at $227K.
Last edited by GasHouseGang; 10-05-2016 at 09:53 AM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It sells for 169k, the flipper loses money. Also PSA 8 Clemente RC for 42k. If this was a flipper, it would also be a loss.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T210 Joe Jackson Hammer Price | kcohen | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 09-09-2016 11:12 PM |
Let's play a game: guess the hammer price order of PWCC Rose RC PSA 6 | rsdill2 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 02-09-2015 09:58 AM |
Brooklyn Atlantics cdv hammer price contest + prize | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 44 | 02-06-2013 04:29 PM |
Anybody surprised by this hammer price? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-12-2007 07:30 AM |
Can someone explain the hammer price on this T206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 01-17-2007 07:06 AM |