![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
After talking with Jantz at the National about "plate scratches" that are found
on some of the Polar Bears I've been working on the Polar Bear scans I have. Most of the "scratches are a fairly straight vertical line similar to a roller mark. Shaw 2.jpg However I have found a few angled horizontal lines similar to the PD 150's. Moran - Copy.jpg I'm not sure if any side by side subjects can be connected with these (so far all of the subjects I have with the vertical and horizontal scratches are print group 2) but I have found a large number (all print group 3-4 and 5 subjects) with print defects. McQuillan - Hummel.jpg These groups of print defects seem to occur in groups of three like the Bergen-Bradley-doolan missing the ie. Bergen-Bradley-Doolan.jpg Mathewson - Meyers - Pelty.jpg There are also examples of different defects found on the same subjects. Young - Conroy 1.jpg Young - Conroy 2.jpg The subjects with the same defects would have been in the same sheet position on different sheets. If you have any Polar bears with scratches or defects please post them in this thread. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here's a couple of more trio's'
Burch - Chase (Black Cap)-Murray.jpg Marquard - Pfeffer.jpg Marquard PB - Copy.jpg There's another Marquard with a different mark. The pattern has stayed consistent so far so there should also be some Pfeffer's and Sweeney's with this mark. Marquard PB - (2).jpg |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Good research Pat!
I was aware of & seen the Mathewson-Meyers-Pelty before. Board member Chris R. pointed out these 3 cards to me back in April and we exchanged a couple emails discussing the back similarities of these 3 cards. Here are a few more examples with the vertical line. The players are Scott, Davidson, Milan and Shaw. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Pat,
Looked through my Polar Bear cards and have a few with scratches that run diagonal. 1) Manning(missing corner) 2) Kruger 3) Slagle - faint scratch extending from bottom toward edge |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pat,
Thank you for compiling this information and sharing the research. Have been tracking these print defects as well. Agree with your theory about these subjects sharing the same position on the print plates used for Polar Bear cards. Besides the Mathewson/Meyers/Pelty that share the same back marking, I also have these two cards: 1) Tannehill(Follow through) 2) Cy Young Last edited by rommesc; 10-19-2016 at 06:41 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I took some time and looked at about half of my Polar Bears. Sorry to say that I have no matches on the cards posted so far in this thread.
Here are a few things I did see on the backs of the cards I checked out. These 3 cards had plate scratches on the backs. O'Leary (hok), Lajoie and Ritter. Purtell & Jack White have vertical lines in almost the same spots as the 4 other cards I listed in my earlier post. Doc White has a ink splotch in the "e" of Bear along with a crop line (+) in the upper right corner. My Pelty, Sweeney, Conroy and Slagle were different than the cards you posted, meaning the print was clean or they didn't have a plate scratch on them. My Meyers card was different in the fact that the "s" in the second "always" had a ink splotch dividing the letter. When I get some time in the next few days I will take a look at the rest of my Polar Bears and post up anything that may help. Jantz |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I have scans of a kruger but comparing them to your scans I think it's actually your card. Kruger.jpgKruger PB.jpg Last edited by Pat R; 10-19-2016 at 03:15 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Pat,
I own two PB's that have the "N" in BEEN either partially or fully missing. The attached Smith (Chicago & Boston) has the "N" totally missing and a Magee (Batting) has about 90% of the "N" missing. I cannot seem to get the Magee scan to load though. I can send you scan if you like and maybe you can get it to load. Thanks, Jerry Smith Chicago and Boston PB Back Raw PB Back SGC 40193.jpg |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Remarkable work again, Pat. Great stuff! Wish I had something to add, but I have only another example of the Sweeney with the chunk out of the "O" in Polar.
__________________
Please visit my website at http://t206.monkberry.com/index.html |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thank You Ed. Is your Sweeny missing a chunk in the top left or bottom left
of the O? Patrick |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
At the top. It's identical to the one you showed in your second post. I can't post a picture as the image is too big, but it can be viewed on my website below.
__________________
Please visit my website at http://t206.monkberry.com/index.html |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
For anyone that hasn't checked out Ed's site I highly recommend it. A nice selection of pre-war, good prices and Ed is a pleasure to deal with. Patrick |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Thanks for the new info. That would be great, do you still have my email? The Smith is a new one. I did have a scan of the Magee but yours is probably better. Magee Missing N.jpg Last edited by Pat R; 10-22-2016 at 07:36 AM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: B. Milligan SGC 20 (polar bear) | Joshwesley | T206 cards B/S/T | 4 | 06-24-2016 06:30 AM |
WTB: Cubs with Polar Bear backs/Any Polar Bear backs | wazoo | T206 cards B/S/T | 6 | 09-16-2014 07:55 PM |
Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
Polar Bear Tin | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 12-05-2004 10:30 AM |