![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No reason to provide that information to you. Don't see how it would matter to your purchase decision either. Why even keep track of it?
I submitted 100 cards from the same set on a monthly submission to PSA and when my grades popped, they said one was authentic/trimmed and they wrote that they were not going to slab it. I held the shipment and asked them to slab it anyways as a placeholder (and since I paid for the grade/slab) and when it came through the process again it was a 4.5 VG/EX+. Which grade was more accurate? I don't know. It was 100 years old and I didn't trim it. So multiple reviewers saw it multiple times and initially said it was trimmed, and the second time thought it was very attractive for its age. How important is that knowledge to you?
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Oops...nvm, bumped wrong thread. | npa589 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 7 | 12-13-2013 12:10 PM |
E94 Byrne SGC 35 bumped for price drop again | Kenny Cole | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 06-06-2013 06:43 PM |
article about the buyer of the 1869 Cincinnati card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-25-2009 03:21 PM |
Looking for the buyer of Deric's nine card T206 lot on April 14 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 04-21-2007 07:08 AM |
WANTED:Babe Ruth Rookie....BUMPED | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 08-07-2006 08:57 PM |