 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14
05-29-2016, 08:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I believe that everyone is spot-on with the 8 being the better card. Could it be the back is more off, or what I tend to believe is that PSA has dramatically tightened up their grading. As a result, the 8 at one time, would have been a 9. The 9, would be an 8 if graded now.
I have seen some newly 6's that are far sharper than 8's graded years ago. Now I find myself looking at the card AND the registration number before I decide on a card to buy.
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: 1957 Topps PSA Rookies: Drysdale, Herzog, F. Robinson, Kubek, & Brooks Robinson | wilkiebaby11 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-15-2015 09:24 AM |
| 1957 Topps Brooks Robinson | BillP | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 08-19-2015 04:55 PM |
| WTB, 1957 Topps Brooks Robinson | Peter_Spaeth | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-30-2014 12:14 PM |
| wtb 1957 topps brooks robinson | Peter_Spaeth | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 12-06-2013 07:21 PM |
| 1957 Topps Brooks Robinson RC SGC 7 NM | smrtn240 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 11-04-2013 02:42 PM |
Threaded Mode