Dispute with an auction company

[BrianinAZ]

While I agree he probably should not have sold any cards, thankfully they were common items and not major ones pictured.

I think the auction house is trying to take advanatge of the stuation though as
they know that the 1998 Fller lot A) has more cards by 120 B) has stars that are worth about $500 more than the other lot.

So to me, the auction house sees an opportunity to screw the guy and they are taking advanatge of his selling a few cards. The nice thing is because the lot they sent him is about 25% short of what he was supposed to get, he can probably sue in small claims as he didnt get what was advertised and I presume the guy should know how to do that.

If the guy is wiling to pay $2,3,4 or even $5 per missing card that is penalty enough. If the auction house balks at that fair offer then its obvious the auction house is taking advantage of the guy.