 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
02-25-2016, 12:17 PM
|
||||
|
||||
On aesthetics alone its SGC hands down. You could put a 2015 scrub player in an SGC holder and it looks impressive. Has a little weight to it; framed lovely, and seems as secure as secure can be. Facts are facts. I recently published a very high end (to me) card, and it came in a PSA holder. Might be better for investment purposes but I think the holder looks cheap and denigrates the presentation of the card.
Last edited by Snapolit1; 02-25-2016 at 12:19 PM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Card grading ?'s | GrayGhost | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-04-2014 09:49 AM |
| Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 12:52 PM |
| When will Grading Card Co.'s Consider.. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-10-2007 09:51 AM |
| see, now this is why you do need card grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-29-2005 04:24 PM |
| Card grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 08-21-2002 08:58 PM |
Threaded Mode