 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
01-30-2016, 06:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Well said Canocorn; one of the main aspects of collecting that can get lost is the fact that each and every card is individual and unique-- even cards that have been assigned the same technical grade by a grader. In fact, there can be an enormous difference in visual appearance (eye appeal) between two identically graded cards.
Meeting a new card is thus kind of like meeting a new person, I suppose with the important distinction that cards will always be less chafing than most humans, or at least bosses and wives  And I agree with Peter that both 4s are amazing cards. Last edited by MattyC; 01-30-2016 at 06:28 PM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Some Cool News - Mick Chosen For Topps Museum Exhibit - PICS & TV NEWS LINK ADDED! | MattyC | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 57 | 11-25-2015 07:40 PM |
| My raw 52 Topps MICK what are your thoughts? | marvymelvin | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 06-09-2014 11:33 PM |
| Mick | jimjim | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 2 | 08-08-2013 03:57 PM |
| Joe, Mick and Ted | murphusa | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 0 | 05-05-2013 01:02 PM |
| 1960 Topps Mick, Ford, Stengel | jim | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-17-2011 11:14 AM |
Threaded Mode