 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should Pete Rose be allowed on the HOF ballot? | |||
| YES |
   
|
217 | 54.80% |
| NO |
  
|
179 | 45.20% |
| Voters: 396. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
12-17-2015, 08:52 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Wow! What a great turnout. I've really enjoyed reading through all the comments pro and con. I see both sides of the argument but I still come down on the side of letting him in. I know he screwed up but I just think its been long enough, time served. When Rule 21 was introduced it was for the purpose of cleaning up what was a corrupt game. With contracts what they are today we are in no danger of reverting back to the problems with gambling that plagued the game in its early days. So I think the 26 year banishment has served the same purpose in showing players how serious the league is as a lifetime ban would show.
Last edited by Mountaineer1999; 12-17-2015 at 08:53 PM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| POLL - Rose & Jackson | EvilKing00 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-18-2015 12:35 PM |
| Interesting ESPN poll regarding Pete Rose's lifetime ban | the 'stache | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 55 | 09-16-2014 10:00 PM |
| WTB: '65 or '69 Pete Rose | cusesteve | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-28-2013 01:45 PM |
| Pete Rose RC SGC 98 | afklin | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 02-03-2011 09:56 AM |
| Pete Rose | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 8 | 02-03-2008 11:26 AM |
Threaded Mode