![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Should Pete Rose be allowed on the HOF ballot? | |||
YES |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
217 | 54.80% |
NO |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
179 | 45.20% |
Voters: 396. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I wonder how much money Pete Rose lost when he bet on O.J. Simpson being convicted.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Wow! What a great turnout. I've really enjoyed reading through all the comments pro and con. I see both sides of the argument but I still come down on the side of letting him in. I know he screwed up but I just think its been long enough, time served. When Rule 21 was introduced it was for the purpose of cleaning up what was a corrupt game. With contracts what they are today we are in no danger of reverting back to the problems with gambling that plagued the game in its early days. So I think the 26 year banishment has served the same purpose in showing players how serious the league is as a lifetime ban would show.
Last edited by Mountaineer1999; 12-17-2015 at 08:53 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't see how what Rose did affects his stats, which is what his induction would be based on.
Contrast that with the PED generation - Sosa, McGwire, Bonds etc. They deserve not only to be banned from the HOF but have their stats erased from the record books completely. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
nope
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
What is you view on existing members of the HOF who did the same? Should they be removed? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All you bleeding hearts come out in favor of that BUM. The rule is NO betting on Baseball. Period. He knew it. He did it. He is not above the rules. Screw Pete Rose. Letting him in the hall would be a disgrace.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What players are you talking about? I am not aware of any evidence against existing members of the hof. I have heard acquisitions against Henderson without proof, like Piazza and Bagwell. Barry Bonds admitted under oath that he used steroids, the clear and the cream. If you can provide similar evidence that any current hofer used steroids, then I would favor removing them. Even though I doubt it would ever happen. I don't think there is even a way to expel members from the hof.
Last edited by rats60; 12-18-2015 at 06:53 AM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Rose is a liar, a cheat and a miserable POS. I hope he never gets in. He doesn't deserve the accolades he wants so badly. I don't care what he did on the field, it was what he did off the field that hurt baseball. You can't kick out guys when you find out what they did after the fact but you can keep the guys out who you know exactly what they did. That's why Chase, Jackson and many others aren't in and don't deserve to be.
__________________
I Remember Now. ![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Nationals attended: 4 (3with Otis) |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Similarly, Ty Cobb and Tris Speaker bet on baseball prior to the 1919 World Series and a ban on gambling. Pete Rose bet knowing the rule and punishment and he deserves his permanent banishment while Cobb and Speaker were easily elected. We evolve as a society and make rules that improve us, but we don't punish those who didn't have foreknowledge of those rules. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Thanks, Jason Collecting interests and want lists at https://jasoncards.wordpress.com/201...nd-want-lists/ |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I voted YES based on what he did on the field.
I "met" Pete at Al Lopez Field in the mid 70's. The Red had lost to the Phillies and Pete went something like 1 for 4. He took batting practice after the game. He hit one over the fence and my buddy ran around the park to get it. He came back with the ball, and when Pete had finished his practice, my best friend jumped over the dugout and said, "Mr. Rose, could please you sign this ball for me?" His response was "Get off the f*%&ing field, you f&*%ing kid!", then turned and ran to his dugout...and down the tunnel. I will never forget that day. But, statistically, he belongs in the HOF. Last edited by xplainer; 12-19-2015 at 10:54 AM. Reason: Mispelt werd. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
POLL - Rose & Jackson | EvilKing00 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-18-2015 12:35 PM |
Interesting ESPN poll regarding Pete Rose's lifetime ban | the 'stache | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 55 | 09-16-2014 10:00 PM |
WTB: '65 or '69 Pete Rose | cusesteve | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-28-2013 01:45 PM |
Pete Rose RC SGC 98 | afklin | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 02-03-2011 09:56 AM |
Pete Rose | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 8 | 02-03-2008 11:26 AM |