![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes, the somewhat lower numbers for OMs reflected in somewhat higher prices. Right now on average an OM PSA 5 is getting about 400 (or more) while the same Piedmont might get 320...which seems fair.... The high-grade pop reports don't necessarily reflect the overall numbers. For one example, see Westlake....
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: t206 SLers SGC 45-55 | trobba | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 05-17-2014 05:16 AM |
FS: t206 SLers SGC 20-60 | trobba | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-29-2014 12:23 PM |
FS: t206 SLers - SGC 84 & SGC 80 | trobba | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 03-08-2013 01:20 PM |
FS: T206 Raw w/ SLers | usernamealreadytaken | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 12-21-2010 01:36 PM |
T206's...the harder to get cards ranking? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-10-2007 11:19 AM |