 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15
11-27-2015, 06:25 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Baseball is also just more conducive to people relating to individual players. They aren't hidden under a helmet for one thing. For another, they are out there alone at the plate, on the mound, in the field, for prolonged periods of time where they can be seen and studied. Football for better or worse is much more of a team game, where the whole team moves for a few seconds at a time. And baseball is much more conducive to statistics as well.
Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 11-27-2015 at 06:26 PM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1965 Topps Joe Namath rookie SGC 55 f/s | Akgator1 | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 09-15-2015 09:02 AM |
| WTB 1965 Topps Namath Rookie Low Grade | hookem | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 4 | 04-28-2015 08:31 PM |
| Joe Namath and the 1965 Topps set | TanksAndSpartans | Football Cards Forum | 15 | 04-15-2015 05:03 PM |
| 1965 Joe Namath BVG 7.5 *Old flip* Very clean card! | Sean1125 | Football Cards Forum | 1 | 07-24-2013 06:21 PM |
| 1965 Topps Joe Namath | e107collector | Football Cards Forum | 1 | 10-19-2012 07:51 PM |
Threaded Mode