 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26
08-24-2015, 05:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
The "Ruth" in the signature looks too sloppy to be stamped. Most of the Babe Ruth stamped signatures show every letter more clearly, don't they? The signature also shows signs of fading in parts of the lettering while the stamps on the ball are more even.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ruth Sig - Real or Not so much? | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 01-30-2011 08:54 AM |
| Are 1917 Collins-McCarthy Babe Ruth and 1921 Oxford Ruth real? | Peleseller | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-07-2011 02:07 PM |
| Real Ruth or not? | yanks12025 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 11-04-2009 01:06 PM |
| Real Ruth? | GrayGhost | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 5 | 10-30-2009 06:48 PM |
| This '33 Ruth #53 isn't real, is it? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-22-2001 12:51 PM |
Threaded Mode