 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
08-08-2015, 03:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Hi, Ed.
Ultra-Pro Platinum for me, too. I have found that BCW products leave much to be desired whereas it concerns size. Along with the pages (as you mentioned) their soft sleeves fit so tightly, I fear that a corner will get chipped every time I place a card in one of them. Attached are a few images: the box; the product number; and a Topps Heritage set bindered with Ultra-Pro pages. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions. Best regards, Eric
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (135/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (195/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BCW vs. Ultra Pro | Jayworld | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 6 | 03-11-2014 04:22 PM |
| Ultra Pro pages | robsbessette | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 04-01-2013 07:27 PM |
| Card Saver vs. Ultra Pro | cozmokramer | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-20-2009 05:56 PM |
| e90-1 Ultra - Commons | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 02-25-2006 05:06 PM |
| RE: 5 ULTRA RARE CARDS | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 06-18-2002 12:27 AM |
Threaded Mode