How often do you think PSA/SGC mix up the grades on two cards in a submission?

[Luke]

Ah that's a good point Bryan. Centering top-to-bottom doesn't bother me at all and I didn't even notice. You really don't see any OC qualifiers for a t206 that looks like Lindaman though do you? I've seen plenty of MC, but it usually is because the text is cut off at the bottom.

[Pat R]

I would consider the Oldring a low end 3 at best and maybe the Lindaman a solid 3 (whats the spot on his left cheek ?)

[Luke]

Pretty much what I think about them. I'd probably give Lindaman a 3.5 and Oldring a 2. That mark is a print mark of some sort. Definitely not dirt or tobacco or anything post-production.

[Griffins]

Pretty safe to say they mixed these two up.


The real '54 (the narrower one) should be a 4. The '55 a 5.

[darwinbulldog]

Well, there was that one time...

http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...ighlight=swamp

[frankbmd]

Originally Posted by Pat R

I would consider the Oldring a low end 3 at best and maybe the Lindaman a solid 3 (whats the spot on his left cheek ?)

A deer tick

[Deertick]

Originally Posted by frankbmd

A deer tick

Hey! I resemble that (re)mark!

[1880nonsports]

but while it obviously does happen - in none of the above examples do I think that's the case. They all look to be within the expected tolerances given the overall quality of the services the TPG's render.
I would suggest a clear example would be a submission including ONLY two cards in which the chasm between grades was greater than a single grade - or an admission extracted under the heat lamps from a teenaged grader by one of this site's couch bound litigators.