 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6
07-12-2015, 05:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
My signature pretty much gives away my position in this debate, but I think part of the answer is how the signature looks. If it's well done in fountain pen or sharpie great, OTOH I have been able to grab some of the more difficult cards for my set cheap because the signatures looked like crap. On a more personal level, I've always liked knowing that the player depicted actually held the card I have, especially if it's someone who passed long before my time that I would've liked to meet.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| most valuable signed cards | theshleps | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 9 | 03-30-2015 05:32 PM |
| Derek Jeter in person signed Cards | HOFautosChris | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 7 | 01-30-2014 08:28 PM |
| Signed mets shirt - valuable? | sportscardpete | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 11-23-2011 01:04 PM |
| Is there a pre-war set likely to decrease in value? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 64 | 06-05-2007 02:28 PM |
| You get 3 cards to have signed in person, anybody, anytime | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 04-29-2007 03:27 AM |
Threaded Mode