|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I, too, buy almost exclusively raw cards. I don't have the space to store the oversized holders, and I find that the label takes away from the beauty of the card.
I pay no attention to the "grade" that the seller gives to a raw card - I judge it myself and bid accordingly. I also wonder why people get cards graded that are not worth as much as it costs to grade them. The only value I see to grading is protection against counterfeiting, alterations, and the like. However, I have bought some cards that have been trimmed, and as long as it was done well that doesn't really bother me. If a card is worth more than, say, $300 or so, I am more likely to seek a graded version - or at least be very careful when buying a raw card at an apparent "steal". |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
my feeling after spending thousands of $ on PSA grading is that if you get a grader on his "bad day" or he is about to "finish a shift", then it is up in the air what grades you will receive. It SHOULDN'T be that way.There is a lack of uniformity in the grades entered by PSA.Many times I've broken out cards of which I simply could not accept the grade given.Then re-submitted and got the "right" grade.No one should have to do this.There is the rub .Lastly,I can tell when I've gotten a rookie grading my cards,much more liberal grades. The human element is affecting the outcome.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Personally, I prefer raw cards over graded cards any day. I feel that the slab/present day printing takes away from the prestige and Americana feel of the card. However, with that being said, I mainly buy graded when online due to all the scams, fakes, etc. When buying at shows or my LCS, I prefer raw cards. My 1955 set is all raw, 1956 set is raw/SGC with 1958 being 70/30 raw/graded allocation.
I agree that grading saved the hobby, but grading is sort of a preferential market. For example, I know some guys who submit weekly and because of the amounts of $$ spent they always get high grades on their submissions. The subjectivity kills me
__________________
Building 50's sets and purchase all kinds of vintage. 1955:206/206 complete 1956: 298/341 complete 1957: just starting 1958:515/534 complete; 1 base, 2 numerical checklists and 16 yellow letters 1959: 513/572 1959 PSA 6: 40/572 1965: 352/598 1966: 447/598 1967: /609 1968: /598 1969: 562/664 1970: 635/720 1971: 717/752 |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
grading did save the hobby.....try selling a ungraded set versus a graded set that are Mint.... Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 06-15-2015 at 11:19 AM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is there such a thing as a card stalker or card stalking? | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 04-25-2011 02:51 PM |
| Fatal Flaw - What's the one thing that will keep you from buying a card? | rholmes | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 49 | 05-30-2010 12:12 PM |
| We all hate "What is it worth?" but...what is highest T206 reverse error card has gone for | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 06-02-2008 02:31 PM |
| Ty Cobb Card - the Real Thing? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 02-01-2008 07:40 PM |
| Is there such a thing as grading a Diamond matchbook? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-28-2005 02:45 PM |