 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4
06-04-2015, 06:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Are you positive that was signed in Sharpie? I have seen some sharpie sigs bleed into older cards over the course of many years, but never seen one fade completely away. Even the ones I've seen that were left in direct light (hanging in a classroom for severla years) simply turned a muddled greyish-blue, but are still quite visible. That Drysdale seems more likely to have been signed in some type of water-based ink like a Flair pen.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| new t206 cards & autographs from Historic Autographs | jimmyfoxx | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 08-05-2013 08:32 PM |
| Is there a possability of latent fading on autographed balls from UV? | markf31 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 4 | 07-18-2013 04:45 PM |
| Old Balls and fading signatures? | RelicSports | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 10 | 10-22-2012 11:39 AM |
| Question on lighting/fading cards and autos | campyfan39 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-07-2012 02:55 PM |
| Displaying cards--fading concerns? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 12-09-2006 04:40 PM |
Threaded Mode