![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
ATC had the cards printed up based on regional brand demand. Sweet Caporal was more popular in the Northeast than in the mid-Atlantic, hence more factory 30s than factory 25s. (Piedmont was the dominant brand in the mid-Atlantic). Here are the Lumley pops from my most recent survey: Piedmont 150 = 71 Sweet Cap 150 = 44 Sovereign 150 = 3 Brown Hindu = 1 EPDG = 6 Old Mill = 1 Piedmont 350 = 12 Sweet Cap 350 = 6 I don't have a factory breakdown, but I would venture to say a substantial majority of both the Sweet Cap 150s and 350s would be factory 30. So I think you have your work cut out, especially on the SC 350/25. Happy hunting! Scot Edited to add: You picked a difficult subject to start with. N for Lumley in my survey is only 144, compared to about 200 for a typical common. Last edited by sreader3; 05-24-2015 at 11:29 AM. |
Tags |
lumley |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: T206 Harry Lumley SGC 96, looks like a 10 | CMIZ5290 | T206 cards B/S/T | 7 | 03-08-2015 09:10 AM |
T206 Lumley SGC-45 | Jay Wolt | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 05-12-2013 07:14 PM |
Old Judge Population question | bbcemporium | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 06-09-2009 10:27 AM |
SGC Population Report question - Where are the e101s? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-31-2007 10:00 AM |
Question about Population Reports | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 11-22-2002 06:20 AM |