 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13
03-16-2015, 05:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
WOW, Gary, you think someone overpaid for that one? I don't think any previous examples sold for over $30K.........
You're right about the '62's, Todd. I would consider those to be rookie cards as well since Topps' intention was quite obvious there, just added one additional player as compared to later years. This scenario is far different than a 1915 Red Sox team photo or 1906 Detroit team composite issued on postcards with the entire team present. These can still be earliest major league baseball appearances on cards for Ruth and Cobb, just not rookie cards. Last edited by bcbgcbrcb; 03-16-2015 at 05:33 PM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Questionable autograph | etsmith | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 3 | 09-05-2014 11:10 AM |
| Another questionable Mantle | Nappy1525 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 8 | 07-25-2014 12:30 PM |
| Another Questionable Auction... | Wanzies1278 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 12-12-2009 02:56 PM |
| N4: QUESTIONABLE AUTHENTICITY | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 12-04-2008 06:30 PM |
| questionable purchase much? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-22-2005 06:31 PM |
Threaded Mode