 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
12-07-2014, 06:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I agree that it isn't very appealing to the eye, however, in my mostly uninformed opinion, I think that it is undervalued. When you think about what the '54 #1 & #250, '55 #2, 56 #5, 57&58 #1 plus the AS cards sell for - and then compare what the '59 fleer cards sold for, it seems like a bargain. I am comparing apples & oranges, I know...
__________________
2024 Collecting Goals: 53-55 Red Mans Complete Set 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: 1959 Fleer Ted Williams #68 | dnanln | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-11-2013 06:50 PM |
| WTB: 1959 Fleer Ted Williams #68 | dnanln | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-18-2013 06:33 PM |
| 1959 Fleer Ted Williams | brob28 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 6 | 09-28-2011 09:04 AM |
| F/S: (4) 1959 Fleer Ted Williams SGC 96s | vintagewhitesox | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 08-15-2011 08:55 PM |
| WTB: 1959 Fleer Ted Williams #68 PSA 9 or SGC 96 | Kalineman | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-30-2010 06:25 PM |
Threaded Mode