![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
tough one...diamond cut looks even...top left corner def a little sharp...bottom rt edge looks wavy but I presume thats because it's a poor photo.
a scan would help. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks. I'll try to scan it tomorrow and see if that helps.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Peter,
I agree, on both points. The diamond cut is "equal and opposite," as it should be. Overall, though, it seems a bit short, from top to bottom...ever so slightly. Perhaps it was trimmed along two sides? And yes, a scan would be quite helpful. Best regards, Eric |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think the right edge is wavy. Could just be the photo. When something looks wavy, I just put another card on the table and use the black border line as a guide and see if the card in question has a completely straight edge.
__________________
ThatT206Life.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To me it looks like both sides are slightly trimmed and not a true diamond cut. I don't think any TPG would give it a numerical grade as a result. Just my opinion of course.
__________________
T206 518/518 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have no comment on the card in question. But to the first question of cards being returned E of T and subsequently getting a number grade, I have had both SGC and PSA return cards as E of T and subsequently assign a number grade on a resubmission. I have also cracked out cards from both graders that were definately trimmed that subsequently would not cross or would not regrade.
The graders are not perfect. Last edited by BleedinBlue; 10-22-2014 at 12:19 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I can't recall seeing a diamond cut that occurred on the left/right sides; only top/bottom. I'd say trimmed as well.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Trimmed in my opinion but you should have a much clearer view. Don't let your hopes cloud your view.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I sent a 51' Bowman Mays to SGC and it came back as being trimmed. I then sent it to PSA and they gave it a 4. Card matched up size wise to others and even had 4 relatively rounded corners. Not sure what SGC saw.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+1 ...and my opinion as well.
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1969-topps complete set, high grade,,"""SOLD"""" | mightyq | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-10-2014 01:28 PM |
Legendary Lot 72: 1909-1920s "E"-Caramel Cards and "W"-Strip Cards "Grab-Bag" | x2drich2000 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 09-02-2013 10:07 AM |
Searching for a "Pirate" Cobb....show us these extremely rare "T215" cards ? | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 67 | 12-02-2012 08:52 PM |
Large amount of "e", "w", and "t" cards (and more) for sale/trade!! | shammus | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 12-19-2010 11:31 AM |
"All cards listed are not trimmed and measure out according to specs" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 04-20-2002 07:38 PM |