 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
07-22-2014, 01:43 PM
|
||||
|
||||
School or be schooled
I believe the definition of a basic set indicates all the different images in a set. Thus certain players in the T205 (Breshnahan, Collins, Wallace etc.) that have different poses, such as Mouth Open and Mouth Closed for Collins, would be considered part of the basic set, whereas team changes (I don't think there are any in T205) or variations in back write-up (such as the various Hoblitzell cards) would not be included in a 'basic' set.
Am I correct about this, or do I have retake Vintage 101 to get my facts straight? Brian 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: 1975 Topps Regular in PSA 8+ | AndyG09 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 12-21-2013 03:55 PM |
| How did your team finish the regular season? | 3and2 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 13 | 10-06-2010 12:11 AM |
| T-206 Master List vs. Inaccurate PSA Master Set | JP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 78 | 04-05-2010 05:48 PM |
| WTB E97 Heinchman, regular or black and white | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-06-2008 04:57 PM |
| Variation of Value or just a regular card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 04-25-2006 07:28 AM |
Threaded Mode