![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scot,
Very cool analysis and thanks for sharing! While the numbers speak for themselves I'd add the following word. I'd caution people about reading too much into the scarcity order of ultra-rare backs from this study because even a 'find' of as small of 20-30 back types could significantly effect the percentage found of that backs (e.g. 0.02% vs. 0.04%) However, for less rare series the numbers provide compelling stats on relative scarcity and population sizes. Best Wishes, Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 Team Breakdown | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-15-2009 12:30 PM |
T206 Back Question. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-18-2006 07:00 PM |
T205 Breakdown for back scarcity 2004-05 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-13-2005 05:33 PM |
T206 Back Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-06-2005 11:46 PM |
T206 rarities back breakdown question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 02-15-2005 08:48 PM |