 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
06-28-2014, 04:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
So I have an odd question similar to why is it still shown as the no number if that's the alteration.
As a normal card - Shouldn't it get a 1 or 10? It's not much different from one with paperloss. Which it actually has. Of course there's some intent here, but looked at purely from a technical standpoint all paperloss should be treated the same right? Steve B 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Finding Economic Lessons in Fading Era of Card Shows | fgoodwin | Football Cards Forum | 10 | 04-28-2012 01:32 AM |
| Lessons learned | danski496 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 14 | 04-09-2012 05:40 PM |
| Lessons learned-(copied from memorabilia side) | danski496 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 04-09-2012 07:13 AM |
| My hard lesson learned today | Tom S. | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 01-22-2012 12:14 PM |
| Trimming issue....lessons learned | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-02-2006 03:34 PM |
Threaded Mode