![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It is my opinion that this is no good. Look at how labored everything in the signature is. Koufax is very free flowing and smooth. This is choppy with heavy pen pressure. That is without even going in to detail on the letters. Plus it's a highly desirable notation. The should be screaming to you. Maybe i'm wrong, but I wouldn't buy it.
Last edited by Duluth Eskimo; 06-02-2014 at 09:49 PM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thoughts on this Koufax | isaac2004 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 4 | 12-08-2012 07:27 PM |
thoughts on a koufax | isaac2004 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 5 | 09-04-2012 04:03 PM |
Thoughts on a Ted ball... | jgmp123 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 4 | 05-28-2012 09:13 PM |
Thoughts on this Ruth Ball | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 11-05-2007 08:46 AM |
Thoughts on this Ruth Ball | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-04-2007 06:30 PM |