 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24
02-17-2014, 09:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
They are both great cards and reading the various responses makes me think about what's so great about collecting -- it is so subjective. Each collector is free to enjoy it in his/her own personal way.
An interesting offshoot question which I think about is whether part of the Wagner's popularity is predicated on it being the only Wagner pose in the set. As has been noted, the T206 is one of the most iconic sets in the hobby and IMO the most iconic set of the dead ball era. Wagner was as prominent a player as any in the game at the time the set was issued, and I always felt that there being only one pose of him (and a portrait pose at that with an attractive orange background) is part of the perfect storm of events that fuels the card's popularity. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| E 103 Cobb, Wagner and $ for M 101 Ruth | LincolnVT | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-23-2013 03:37 PM |
| E 103 Wagner, M 101 Ruth | LincolnVT | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-04-2013 07:29 PM |
| A little bit of everything - Ruth, Johnson, Wagner, etc. | David Halpen | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 8 | 05-19-2009 11:11 PM |
| Biggest bucks: Wagner or Ruth? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 04-20-2008 05:51 AM |
| $600-700 to spend on best Ruth or Wagner | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 09-06-2006 05:26 PM |
Threaded Mode