![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My initial impression was based on the back - looks slightly pitted, and not as dark as all the ones I've seen. But it's hard to tell from a scan.
I thought it had been determined that the Vermont stuff was much more modern than 1902-20. It doesn't make sense to me that someone would have started forging tintypes and albumens during that period (1902-20), unless it was a hobbyist who was playing around with the old techniques. Not trying to be hostile or anything, as this doesn't affect me - just trying to give my opinion. I actually would probably prefer to find out that all of this stuff was legit.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Old Judge Bobby Mathews (Reluctantly considering Selling) | Misunderestimated | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-01-2011 11:18 PM |
N172 Bobby Mathews for Trade | bigfish | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 1 | 07-31-2009 06:30 PM |
N172 Bobby Mathews | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-29-2008 06:45 PM |
OT - Unusual Uniform on Tintype | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-14-2005 08:06 PM |
Tintype - Need help with Uniform era | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-18-2005 04:06 PM |