![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's why I collect pre-war baseball postcards. Some are so darn rare you can't be picky when it comes to condition so I never ask. Sweet Ruth Leon!
__________________
My collection can be viewed at http://imageevent.com/jeffintoronto Always looking for interesting pre-war baseball & hockey postcards! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am naturally wary of any old card that is too mint. Additionally, some wear on much older cards looks appropriate, adds charm and character, and thus-- for me-- enhances eye appeal.
Time and again we have seen cards in higher numerical grade (closer to MINT) look worse to the eye than lower grade examples. I tend to really appreciate a collection that manages to find hugely appealing pieces that are not obvious mint blazers. Sure, if the money is in hand, it's easy to throw big dollars around and obtain a Mint 9 Mantle or Clemente RC. But try finding one that looks great for under 4k. The latter is some challenge. Conversely, I don't see anything to celebrate when a card labeled MINT 9 or GEM MT 10 is purchased-- but it actually looks overgraded, as many are. I get a sinking feeling when I see a 10 being brandished, that say has obvious tilt or a touched corner. I love cards with total pops in the 100-range or less, because you are just thrilled to have an example in your collection-- and one with any eye appeal is just gravy! Hence why most of my favorite cards are lowly 1s to 3s LOL. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I love cards with total pops in the 100-range or less, because you are just thrilled to have an example in your collection-- and one with any eye appeal is just gravy! Hence why most of my favorite cards are lowly 1s to 3s LOL.[/QUOTE]
This is where I find myself as well. I prefer overall rarity vs condition rarity. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
great cards, Dean...I totally agree. But there can't be more than a few dozen max on those!!!!
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While I appreciate mint cards, like many of you, almost all of mine are more of a "cinnamon" in nature.
![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The craze of the late 80s, early 90s really created a world full of idiots when it comes to card collecting. Most of my friends who I try to talk about collecting with have the similar mint mindset and still hold on to their shoeboxes full of 91 Topps hoping for a big payday one day because the cards are mint. My parents are like, "that's pretty neat" but always come back to "What is it worth?" That's why I don't regularly share my collection with others. People hear baseball cards and think stocks and bonds rather than strikes and balls.
I've learned to collect what I like, disregard the naysayers who can't appreciate a sweet card and only want to know how much money your collection is worth. They ask if the cards are mint because they equate mint to US Mint.
__________________
N300: 11/48 T206: 175/524 E95: 24/25 E106: 4/48 E210-1: Completed December 2013 R319: 43/240 |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1977 topps hockey set nr mint to mint ends Sunday 11 ended sold | rjackson44 | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 4 | 10-20-2013 08:58 PM |
Looking for Ted Williams Cards Ex-Mint | rayefc | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 07-15-2013 08:28 AM |
1950s to 1970s near mint to mint cards mantle, koufax, ford, spahn and more | aclinton1107 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 9 | 01-26-2013 09:02 PM |
1958 all star mickey mantle near mint to mint | aclinton1107 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 01-21-2013 12:02 PM |
Selling ex/mint to near mint 1963 Topps baseball-SOLD | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 09-27-2008 08:20 AM |