![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I checked out the back scans, and I think PSA meant to put those grades on them. I've been looking at a lot of T206 Cobbs in 1-3 grade lately, just doing research, and I've found that PSA *really* takes the backs into account, especially paper loss. I've found cards that appear 6+ on the front but paper loss on the back brought it to a 1. The 1 in question here does have bad staining on the back.
Please note, I'm not defending their grade, and actually believe the 2 and 1 should be flipped. Just offering one opinion that PSA gives a lot of weight to the back on T206's. Personally, I'd still rather have a nice front/bad back than anything with a corner chunk missing! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Please explain sgc grading | Merrillstoys | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 03-21-2010 03:29 PM |
Can anyone explain or help me with this uncataloged Kahns card | JMANOS | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 07-25-2009 06:20 PM |
When will Grading Card Co.'s Consider.. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-10-2007 09:51 AM |
Can anyone explain grading and paperloss? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 05-30-2007 08:15 AM |
Card grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 08-21-2002 08:58 PM |