Problem with Legendary Lot . . . Opinions?

[Shouldabeena10]

I'm not sure what's worse;

1) The auction house selectively choosing when to mention pinholes / cuts / paper loss in their descriptions, and when to omit them.

2) The auction house obviously having the capability to provide decent sized scans on a $1500 small lot of cards, and choosing not to use it on some, while using it on others.

3) The grading companies, being able to lump together so many different "issues" under the heading of their lowest grade.

4) Or me, spending 30 minutes of my life reading through all 5 pages of lawyer speak in this thread, only to find out at the end ... that Vargha never posted larger scans of the cards either... after promising multiple times to do so.

I'd like to request a pro bono team of Net54 lawyers assemble and file a lawsuit against David for wasting my time, building up my curiosity to see such scans, and then failing to provide them as promised.

David, .... with the let down of expectations, broken promises, bad customer service, and lack of decent sized scans you've failed to provide in this thread .... you could basically run an auction house! ;-) lol