 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4
12-02-2013, 10:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Mantle`
Matt,
I would have to give a No as well. There are a lot of things which are not consistent that give me concerns. The washed out colors are a huge issue, as well as the dark staining on the back which makes it look like it was given a bath in tea, while the colors on the front are washed and not consistent. The corner wear isn't consistent either - just looks odd. Just too many things that don't look right. I would be curious to see his answers for why he didn't get it graded... Nice Gehrig logo in your avatar....it looks like the Gehrig signature on the wall at the Louisville Slugger museum/factory. Z Wheat 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ***REPRINT*** 1952 topps mantle, old, looks feels real | soxfan1986 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 20 | 12-21-2013 10:06 PM |
| 1953 Topps Mantle - Fake, Real and/or Trimmed? | aquarius31 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 08-09-2013 07:46 AM |
| 1952 Topps Mantle Real???? | Tcards-Please | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 03-13-2010 11:27 PM |
| 1952 Topps Mantle REAL? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 11-30-2008 03:10 AM |
| Real Or Fake 52 topps Mantle | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 09-04-2007 12:21 AM |
Threaded Mode