recent m101-6 jackson

[kengoldin]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Not even Nash insinuates there was an image of another M101-6 publicly available, at least as I read his post. That being the case, and given that Ken says he still has not seen an image of another one, I wonder what the "conclusive" evidence Ken mentions was that convinced him to change the auction description. The old Leland's description Nash mentions does appear to be erroneous and refers to an M101-4.

Still have not seen another images of an actual card besides one that was sold.
I was emailed a copy of of the 1994 listing of a the card in question on that date, and although it was listed as a 1919 card and did not show a picture, I thought it was prudent to edit and be cautious since it was so close to auction close .
The image on black Betsy appears to be a photo, not a card as the background is different ( when I last looked a week ago)My writer was not aware of that photo though either.