How About Some Love for 1974's?

[KCRfan1]

Mark, if you collect B Robinson cards, I imagine you are very disappointed ( I am ) with the lack of variety between his cards from year to year. When I think of Robinson, I think of fielding first. What a great player, and Topps gave no thought to his cards, and could have / should have produced more photos of him in the field. The only card with Brooks in the field is his 73. His other cards in the years of 66,67,68,69,70,72, and 77 are cookie cutter photos and unimaginative. The 76 looks like he's shielding his eyes from the sun. Great player, Topps did his cards no justice though.

[steve B]

He's one of my favorite players too.

I met him in 76, at a Sports Illustrated Hospitality suite (I was 13, so it was a bit unusual) He held up the autograph line to talk baseball, and the one guy who complained got put in his place very quickly.

Keeping his priorities left a lasting impression, even though I didn't know just why at the time.

Steve B

[Mark70Z]

Lou... You're right. The 1963/1964 have the same pose, the 1967/1969 (also the Super) same pose, and also used the 1962 pose on several issues like the stamp, coin, etc.

I do like all of his cards, but they could/should have been a lot better in my view.

Steve... Every time I have met Brooks it's always been a great experience. Always seems to act like you're a long lost friend. Makes it even nicer to collect his stuff.

Now... If anyone has a '61 Dice Game, '67/'68 Disc, or the '68 3D they can give/sell me it would make me feel a whole lot better!

Back the original subject. Overall I like the '74 set, but there are several I liked a lot better back in the day, and probably still do. I love the '71's and '75 set, but really who knows why...