![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Travis can stay over there and not ever comment over here again.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I dont have any respect for him because of the way he used his wife. That I think is the main reason everyone went off
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Not giving me an explanation as to why my membership was denied (and who denied it) is one thing, but to use your wife as a shield is beyond my comprehension. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have supported him at times, realizing that I risked being branded a moron, but I agree - attempting to use his wife as a shield was the last straw.
Travis is nowhere as dishonest as Nash, but as Nash has to do with the hobby in general, Travis needs to have an epiphany which results in a sincere note of apology to this forum.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why should Travis apologize to any of you? Unlike some members here, I have not seen him trash any of you personally on here. I'm not sure if this forum has one, but a lot of forums do, it's called an ignore option.
I personally don't know Travis, never met him, done business with him or anything. My sole knowledge of Travis is what I see on here, and it is ridiculous what some people care about, think is such a big deal, or is a life changing event. If this place is your life, perhaps you need to reevaluate it. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sounds more like it's yours.
Good luck with your 'save the Travis' mission.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
...and I have taken your advice. Travis is at least entertaining.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
[I]"When you photograph people in colour you photograph their clothes. But when you photograph people in B&W, you photograph their souls." ~Ted Grant Www.weingartensvintage.com https://www.facebook.com/WeingartensVintage http://www.psacard.com/Articles/Arti...ben-weingarten ALWAYS BUYING BABE RUTH RED SOX TYPE 1 PHOTOGRAPHS--->To add to my collection |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
"Why won't those stupid idiots let me in their crappy club for jerks?"
-Homer the great ...or you can try the non-cartoon Homer: "A decent boldness ever meets with friends. "
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 09-08-2013 at 01:32 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
exactly, thank you. i dont have a reason to apologize to any of the agigtators here, i have not attacked anyone here. i dont use my wife as a shield as she is her own person and she wanted to make a website for autograph collecting and she bought it. people love to pile on when they can pick out a person like my wife that they think will "get to me" but it doesnt work. meanwhile i dont personally attack anyone here but instead I show the shortcomings of a few big companies i feel should be doing a better job for their customers, like psa, jsa, heritage. that strikes a chord from people like chris that like these companies so he finds a company owned by my wife and goes after it.. agains, a bunch of sexist comments from people who think a woman can't own anything or have an interest in autographs without other people controlling it and they will have to live with their preconceived notions of what a woman is capable of doing in this day and age. they are living in the 1940's, well good for them! That's probably why there are no women here on this forum. when is the last time you saw a woman post here and would you blame her? I don't. Why would women want to come on here and participate with the prevailing attitude that they can't be interested in autographs, and it is all part of some conspiracy? it's ridiculous but those who trash her are ridiculous as well adn they should know better but they enjoy picking out someone who doesn't have anything to do with the feud they are in but just for the sole reason that they are related to someone they have a beef with and notice how the thread is about Mueller now and of course my wife has nothing to do with it but they keep dragging her into it for the sole reason that they think it will get to me. if they had any decency they would pick on someone their own size but they don't as we have seen. Last edited by travrosty; 09-09-2013 at 03:52 AM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
exactly, thank you. i dont have a reason to apologize to any of the agitators here, i don't attack them, but they need to attack relatives. i dont use my wife as a shield as she is her own person and she wanted to make a website for autograph collecting and she bought it. people love to pile on when they can pick out a person like my wife that they think will "get to me" but it doesnt work. meanwhile i dont personally attack anyone here but instead I show the shortcomings of a few big companies i feel should be doing a better job for their customers, like psa, jsa, heritage. that strikes a chord from people like chris who like these companies so he finds a small hobby website owned by my wife with no paying customers and no paying service that is being offered and goes after it. agains, a bunch of sexist comments from people who think a woman can't own anything or have an interest in autographs without other people controlling it and they will have to live with their preconceived notions of what a woman is capable of doing in this day and age. They are living in the 1940's, well good for them! That's probably why there are no women here on this forum. when is the last time you saw a woman post here and would you blame anyone for staying away? I don't. Why would women want to come on here and participate with the prevailing attitude that they can't be interested in autographs, and it is all part of some conspiracy? it's ridiculous but those who trash her are ridiculous as well and they should know better but they enjoy picking out someone who doesn't have anything to do with the feud they are in but just for the sole reason that they are related to someone they have a beef with. notice how the thread is about Mueller now and of course my wife has nothing to do with it but they keep dragging her into it for the sole reason that they think it will get to me. if they had any decency they would pick on someone their own size but they don't as we have seen. They act like they know my wife and they don't. They never met her, or have ever talked to her. but they know her right? Last edited by travrosty; 09-09-2013 at 04:19 AM. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I wanted to know my the "owner (Nora Roste)" and the person (Nora Roste) "in-charge" of AutographPlanet denied my membership? Very simple, Travis. Unless something reads incorrectly on the AutographPlanet website, Nora Roste is the "owner" and "in-charge." If I had received a reply from the "owner" of AutographPlanet explaining why my membership was denied (like Leon did for DB), this would have been all said and done. But while you can continue to rant and rave over here on Net54 unobstructed, I was denied membership over at AutographPlanet. Also, this thread was done a few days ago, but when you came back to comment, you revived it. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Not trying to make your brain pop or anything, but...
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
![]() |
Tags |
autographplanet, nora roste |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA Membership Submission | V117collector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 12-08-2009 02:47 PM |
Life membership cards. What year? | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 04-11-2008 11:21 AM |
SABR membership | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 09-19-2006 11:35 PM |
SABR - membership = $60./yr. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 01-31-2005 07:44 AM |
SABR pub of interest / membership deadline | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-11-2003 04:54 PM |