Hauls of Shame - Who is Peter Nash?

[Deertick]

Originally Posted by Sunny

From: "Peter Nash"
To: "Erin l. Henderson"
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:43 AM
Subject: Audio Tape/transcript
Erin,
The audio tape with the phone voice mail from my partner Ken Casey took place on Saturday April 19th, 2008 at 4:24 pm FROM xxx-xxx-xxxx. (22 SECONDS)

Vice Mail Transcript:

Ken Casey: Pete, it's Kenny. I got that 150 cash. let's get down there with a f**kin bag of money and a baseball bat and a f**kin pen and a piece of paper. Give me a call back.


Peter

PS I have the tape, don't have a dupe deck?

Robert,
Isn't it time to let bygones be bygones? I mean, in a week it will be TWO years ago!! People change! Peter changed! He is a Crusader For All That Is Good And Ethical.

Now back off or else. I can still swing a bat and I could use the money, if you know what I mean.

[Runscott]

BAM!

Wow - I took credit for an idea that JAY actually came up with

This thread has it all: 'where is the provenance?', etc:

2003 Net 54 discussion about 1869 Red Stockings Clock Full 'o Balls

[Cardboard Junkie]

Ten Years After.......there I worked in a musical reference and it remains relevant to the mentioned thread! Dave.

[wonkaticket]

Originally Posted by Deertick

Robert,
Isn't it time to let bygones be bygones? I mean, in a week it will be TWO years ago!! People change! Peter changed! He is a Crusader For All That Is Good And Ethical.

Now back off or else. I can still swing a bat and I could use the money, if you know what I mean.

Jim, the above Nash is a “Crusader for All” is meant to be tongue and cheek correct? Also for the record, if somebody threatened to break my legs, and ripped me off not sure why I would need to let it go two years later or ever for that matter. Not letting these little gems go doesn’t make Robert a bad man here how can anyone in there right mind turn that around on him? He’s a victim of this set of circumstances not the perpetrator. Again if you were joking please ignore.

If not and you're sincere in your statement then I have to wonder how you or anyone else can support someone who is so quick to point everyone else’s frauds yet won’t come clean on his own.

As said a million times all of which seem to fall on deaf ears both Peter’s and his fans.

When Peter comes clean, pays his bills or makes a real attempt to. Faces his legal issues head on vs. hiding and taking the fifth. Then and only then after that little baptism by fire will I consider defending Peter Nash’s new turned over leaf and self-appointed position of “hobby crusader”. Until then he’s just a another conman who is putting up smoke screens to draw attention away from his own current issues and abysmal past.

[joeadcock]

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

When Peter comes clean, pays his bills or makes a real attempt to. Faces his legal issues head on vs. hiding and taking the fifth. Then and only then after that little baptism by fire will I consider defending Peter Nash’s new turned over leaf and self-appointed position of “hobby crusader”. Until then he’s just a another conman who is putting up smoke screens to draw attention away from his own current issues and abysmal past.

Having now spent a bit of time reading this and prior thread about Mr. Nash, it would seem coming clean, via forms mentioned above would be his redemption...........as mentioned in the Bible, knowledge of past deeds means you must try and fix them as humanely possible before moving on(so to speak). Otherwise, trust is lacking.

Dont know anything about these groups mentioned above. Out in Florida, didn't hear much about them........some of my faves:GTR and Expose(in love with them during the post disco days).

[Deertick]

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

Jim, the above Nash is a “Crusader for All” is meant to be tongue and cheek correct? Also for the record, if somebody threatened to break my legs, and ripped me off not sure why I would need to let it go two years later or ever for that matter. Not letting these little gems go doesn’t make Robert a bad man here how can anyone in there right mind turn that around on him? He’s a victim of this set of circumstances not the perpetrator. Again if you were joking please ignore.

If not and you're sincere in your statement then I have to wonder how you or anyone else can support someone who is so quick to point everyone else’s frauds yet won’t come clean on his own.

As said a million times all of which seem to fall on deaf ears both Peter’s and his fans.

When Peter comes clean, pays his bills or makes a real attempt to. Faces his legal issues head on vs. hiding and taking the fifth. Then and only then after that little baptism by fire will I consider defending Peter Nash’s new turned over leaf and self-appointed position of “hobby crusader”. Until then he’s just a another conman who is putting up smoke screens to draw attention away from his own current issues and abysmal past.

[thetruthisoutthere]

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

When Peter comes clean, pays his bills or makes a real attempt to. Faces his legal issues head on vs. hiding and taking the fifth. Then and only then after that little baptism by fire will I consider defending Peter Nash’s new turned over leaf and self-appointed position of “hobby crusader”. Until then he’s just a another conman who is putting up smoke screens to draw attention away from his own current issues and abysmal past.

Travis thinks this thread is a bust because of the criticism directed towards Peter Nash.

Travis does the same thing when Todd Mueller is the subject of criticism.

[travrosty]

Originally Posted by thetruthisoutthere

Travis thinks this thread is a bust because of the criticism directed towards Peter Nash.

Travis does the same thing when Todd Mueller is the subject of criticism.

Non i dont , when you start a todd mueller thread, which i have never seen you do, i dont care and its fine, why dont you go ahead, would that one be a bust too, yes.

[sago]

Originally Posted by travrosty

Non i dont , when you start a todd mueller thread, which i have never seen you do, i dont care and its fine, why dont you go ahead, would that one be a bust too, yes.

How is this thread a bust? Dude, you are quickly moving from sycophant to martyr to pariah. Once Nash finally gets what is coming to him in terms of civil penalties and possible jail time, you will look even more foolish. I suggest giving up the kool-aid for awhile.

D@vid D@vis

[oldjudge]

John--cabbage stealing coupled with Internet porn. Did that all lead to this?

[wonkaticket]

Originally Posted by oldjudge

John--cabbage stealing coupled with Internet porn. Did that all lead to this?

Jay I'm outraged by this post you know damn good and well it lead to exactly that! Can't a guy have sex with a head of cabbage without being singled out these days?

[thetruthisoutthere]

Originally Posted by travrosty

Non i dont , when you start a todd mueller thread, which i have never seen you do, i dont care and its fine, why dont you go ahead, would that one be a bust too, yes.

You might be right, Travis, but my below thread certainly wasn't a bust:

http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=175073

[E93]

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

When Peter comes clean, pays his bills or makes a real attempt to. Faces his legal issues head on vs. hiding and taking the fifth. Then and only then after that little baptism by fire will I consider defending Peter Nash’s new turned over leaf and self-appointed position of “hobby crusader”. Until then he’s just a another conman who is putting up smoke screens to draw attention away from his own current issues and abysmal past.

+1

There is not a small amount of irony in a person accused and found liable in court for $100,000s of fraud in this hobby started a website to start slinging accusations at others before cleaning up his own side of the street. Personally, I would not believe a word he says on that website.
JimB