Worch Cigar project

[ullmandds]

more

[ullmandds]

Can't forget Bob!

[MikeGarcia]

....Graded several months apart about five years ago..... the graders apparently used different sources for ID purposes ; one flip indicates that there is another var. which has a background , the other implies that there exists another pose....

....these two are identical except : the one with the sloppily-placed name-box and 'way too much ink has a larger projection of the subject by almost 10% ,which puts his head closer to the top border . You have to stare at them for a long time to see it . I need to get a life beyond staring at old baseball cards.

[MikeGarcia]

''No Background'' dominates the few I have had graded by PSA ..... Does SGC use any phrase up in their flips to signify varieties ?

...The Norris looks incomplete ; or perhaps rushed by the art department or the printer...

[MikeGarcia]

[cliftons8]

I have an Earl Combs. Sorry no scan.

[MikeGarcia]

.....there's no ''shiney'' of the black or dark areas visible when you tilt and wobble into a strong light but the size difference of the subject is quite pronounced ( staring at old baseball cards is not a complete waste of time sometimes..... even the WidowGarcia was impressed with this discovery.....or at least pretended to be .)

...the '39 Exhibits have one card that has a ''projection'' notation...don't know of any others...

There is a technical term for that '' shiney''aspect of some sepia-toned photos from this era.....could someone familiar with that please say what it is ?
Thanks , MikeGarcia

... Tim....awesome project idea . Thanks.