Is it just me, or is sometimes the lower graded card BETTER looking??

sflayank · #1 07-30-2013, 05:23 PM

why is the back of one whitish and the other dark grey?
scan bad?

bobbyw8469 · #2 07-30-2013, 05:46 PM

Quote:

why is the back of one whitish and the other dark grey?
scan bad?

No...I thought it was normal to see different colored backs on the 1952 Topps. Maybe someone familiar with the set can chime in?

steve B · #3 07-31-2013, 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

No...I thought it was normal to see different colored backs on the 1952 Topps. Maybe someone familiar with the set can chime in?

Yes, many series come on different cardboard. That's common for all the 50's sets and even some 60's. I didn't know High number 52s had the difference too. Probably because I only have one high number.

The 1.5 has a texture that makes me think water damage, but I'd probably go for the 1.5 as well.

Steve B

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
FS: t206 SGC (lower) graded HOFers	trobba	Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T	0	06-02-2013 05:19 AM
trading for lower graded E97 and E101	t213	Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T	0	09-15-2012 04:30 PM
FS: 1955 Topps Graded and Raw (Prices VCP or Lower)	Bunker	1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T	1	12-13-2011 05:26 PM
FS: 20 Card Graded T206 Lot - Lower Grade PRICE DROP	marcdelpercio	Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T	5	08-10-2011 07:59 PM
T205 Suggs Graded 1 (or lower)	Archive	Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T	0	03-06-2005 11:16 AM