FS: T206 Ty Cobb Bat Off Green Apple Sov.

[Shoele$$]

Closer scan....

[npa589]

Closer scan:

[Shoele$$]

Those edges and corners don't even look like the same card. Scans on 2nd pick has corners all banged up, not the case.

[npa589]

Are you serious Glenn? It's the same card.

[Shoele$$]

As a heart attack Nate....

[Mick_7]

My offer still stands Glenn if you change your mind. It's still an impossible front and back combo to find. Still the only one I've ever seen.

[npa589]

I have no problem with the sale, nor the sale price. However, its current value should not be based upon an advertisement of being "crease free" and "undergraded" when, in fact, it is not crease free, nor has it been undergraded......twice.

If someone feels it is worth that price with those facts being described, that is completely fine.

[thenavarro]

Maybe it had a trip to the doctor in between PSA and SGC to soak and press the crease out and to press and sharpen the corners?

(Before anyone gets bent out of shape I'm not accusing the original poster of doing that,, just trying to find a logical explanation for the striking similarities but yet subtle differences in the scans posted)

Looks like the same card to me too on a quick glance

Overall I think its a great, attractive to the eye, iconic card of the great Cobb

[npa589]

If the crease was perfectly pressed out somehow, it wouldn't be a 3.

If scans (and less brightening) of the Cobb in an SGC holder were put on here with the same resolution of the Cobb in my previous PSA holder were put, you'd see all of the "similarities".

It is 100% the same card.

Mike C. can vouch for that, as he was the one who also knows I sold the card to Steve K. a couple months back. Steve then sold the card on eBay. I know this, as others do, because I saw it on eBay. I even asked Steve about it and he verified.

[calvindog]

Originally Posted by npa589

Closer scan:

Wow, my eyes are better than a loupe!