![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know SGC's methodology, but a microscope should work through shellac if the shellack is relatively clear. My microscope could saw a card's printing through a PSA holder. You have to be able to get the microscopic image in focus, and a thin film shouldn't prevent that. If somethings framed behind glass, then that can be too far away to get a proper focused look.
With old photos it can be a different situation, as you often have to look at the paper fibers to authenticate. Shellac could probably hide that view. I think shellac could cause legitimate authentication problems with an 1800s photograph. Though I can't recall ever having had a photo old or new that was shellacked, so I'm speculating. And, anyway, with a T206 you're examining the printing not the paper fibers. Last edited by drc; 05-02-2013 at 01:28 AM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Should Andrew with the Nuns Wagner Stay or Go | Wymers Auction | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 02-19-2013 02:50 PM |
The nuns finally get paid for the T206 Wagner | henson1855 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 12-20-2010 07:25 PM |
Need opinion...Wagner t206-the age old question | sportfan23 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 11-29-2009 09:32 PM |
Multi t206 Wagner owner question... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-15-2008 01:43 PM |
T206 PSA 8 Wagner Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 08-15-2006 08:55 PM |